Statistics and Research – Exam Review Set 3

Statistics and Research — free preview
Question 1 of 2
Case slide
Score: 0 / 0
Pediatric Case ReviewPediatric Exam Review Sets
This content is for members. First, create a free account to browse samples — then choose a plan to unlock everything. Already a member? Log in here.

What this deck covers

Statistics and Research – Exam Review Set 3 in 50 board-style clinical cases with worked explanations. Each case gives you a clinical vignette, four options, the correct answer, and an explanation of why each of the other three is wrong, with the guideline or textbook it follows named on the answer.

Board-style teaching questions for paediatricians and trainees preparing for paediatric board, MRCPCH and licensing examinations. Written from published guidelines and standard paediatric textbooks, with the source named on every answer.

The 50 cases, in order

  1. The audit says who, not why
  2. Not the first twenty who say yes
  3. The last three said the same
  4. Counting the reasons is not analysis
  5. One person read all of them
  6. Sixty notes and a policy
  7. It sat in a folder for months
  8. Three families, not three wards
  9. Eighteen dots, not two averages
  10. What the target might bend
  11. Before, and then again after
  12. A, B and C at the same time
  13. Nineteen said nothing
  14. Dropping the ones who did not take it
  15. Only interested if it helps?
  16. Admissions fell everywhere
  17. The newer drug went to the sicker
  18. Does it work for him?
  19. It worked under ideal conditions
  20. Weak effect, but almost everyone
  21. Better numbers, unchanged children
  22. Nine in ten were clinic visits
  23. None of it was theirs
  24. Eleven studies, eight questions
  25. Side effects are uncommon
  26. Not just the years added
  27. More money, more good: how much?
  28. A third of the price
  29. Somebody took the week off
  30. Same deaths, different totals
  31. Marked its own homework
  32. Eight outcomes, thirty predictors
  33. Accurate, but does it help?
  34. One in ten meant one in three
  35. Bloods take an hour
  36. Nine hundred against eighty
  37. The interval got wider
  38. Narrow diamond, scattered dots
  39. No head-to-head trial exists
  40. Only two reported the age group
  41. More diagnosed, no fewer deaths
  42. Eleven not in the report
  43. Twenty-eight normal, still worried
  44. Every year instead of three
  45. Five-year survival looks better
  46. One rating, many trials
  47. Nobody was blinded
  48. A day sooner, and vomiting
  49. Strong words, weak evidence
  50. Posted online, not in a journal

Diagnoses and management options tested

Across the fifty cases you are asked to choose between options such as: A randomised trial of two different reminder systems, A larger review, since sixty was too few, How satisfied the staff are with the new arrangement, Nothing can be concluded until the sample is larger, A laboratory study of the device’s delivered dose, The mildest component is driving the whole result, The relative risk reduction, The number of children admitted was small, The predicted risks should match the risks observed, It assumes the true effect differs between studies, Pool the two trials that reported it, The two children who genuinely have the condition, The best single trial behind it, Low certainty is a formality when experts agree.

Clinical pearls from this deck

  • A tick-box list measures your own guesses. It cannot find the reason you never guessed.
  • Random is right when you are counting. When you are listing, choose on purpose.
  • You cannot calculate how many, because you do not yet know how many reasons exist.
  • A percentage needs a denominator that means something. Seventeen chosen families is not one.
  • Where two coders disagree is where the theme is doing too much work.
  • Ask what the answer will be. A gap against a standard is audit; a new truth is research.

Work through the deck once for recognition, then again a week later to test yourself — each question gives the answer and explains why every other option fails.

More from this system: all statistics and research case decks · pediatric reference values.

Scroll to Top