Paediatric reference ranges load here when you open this panel. See the full table of normal values.
Confidentiality and breaking bad news are in Set 3.
Case Complete
What this deck covers
Ethics and Communication – Set 2 in 50 board-style clinical cases with worked explanations. Each case gives you a clinical vignette, four options, the correct answer, and an explanation of why each of the other three is wrong, with the guideline or textbook it follows named on the answer.
Board-style teaching questions for paediatricians and trainees preparing for paediatric board, MRCPCH and licensing examinations. Written from published guidelines and standard paediatric textbooks, with the source named on every answer.
The 50 cases, in order
- Needle feared to paralyse
- Teenager says no to theatre
- Sign today or lose the theatre slot
- Family fears the machine
- Who cannot consent for themselves
- Bleeding never mentioned beforehand
- Planned repair declined today
- Healthy son of an affected father
- Forehead wound, no family reachable
- Explaining the dangers honestly
- Who signs at thirteen
- Father who reads little
- Abandoned newborn, planned surgery
- Parents request a hysterectomy
- What makes a signature count
- Safety-net advice before going home
- Principle behind the clinic’s stance
- Orphaned girl with a scalp cut
- Refusal stands, plan for tonight
- Why his no is not final
- What informed consent means
- Harmful refusal outside an emergency
- Who authorises sterilisation
- Mole removed without being asked
- Worry about a toddler’s brain
- Upset father presses for testing
- Drowsy after a fall, nobody to ask
- Why this refusal can stand
- Assent still withheld after two talks
- Girl asks whether it will hurt
- Airway failing, mother says no
- Guiding test for surrogate choices
- When surgery may go ahead unconsented
- Stuck groin lump, mother says no
- If symptoms appear later
- Who certifies the urgency
- Chart entry after a declined scan
- Father asks about the age limit
- How agreement to surgery is recorded
- Angry family after the emergency
- Least restrictive period care
- Order of steps ahead of theatre
- Distressed parent threatening to leave
- Recessive gene in the family
- One parent away on Umrah
- Parents ask to stop life support
- Unexpected finding under anaesthesia
- Elective surgery, guardian untraceable
- One mother, two different outcomes
- Parents’ safety worry about her
Diagnoses and management options tested
Across the fifty cases you are asked to choose between options such as: Ask what they have heard and what worries them most, Wait for a court order before starting, Discharge him with no plan for follow-up, The procedure carries no risk of any kind, The senior nurse of the ward where he is cared for, Stop him crying, To the treating consultant alone, Tell her the anaesthetic carries no risk of any kind, Diagnostic tests never need parental consent, Wait for her father to arrive and decide, Rebook him for a planned repair next week, Only that the parents are uncooperative, Avoid them until they have calmed down, Security staff, to remove her from the ward.
Clinical pearls from this deck
- Ask why before you explain.
- The guardian’s consent makes surgery lawful; the child’s assent is still sought.
- Consent must be free: no pressure, no threats.
- Life-saving care refused by the guardian: his consent is not required.
- Cannot consent for themselves: under 18, mentally incapacitated, unconscious.
- No full disclosure, no informed consent.
Work through the deck once for recognition, then again a week later to test yourself — each question gives the answer and explains why every other option fails.
More from this system: all ethics and communication case decks · pediatric reference values.