Ethics & Communication – Exam Review Set 3

Ethics & Communication — free preview
Question 1 of 2
Case slide
Score: 0 / 0
Pediatric Case ReviewPediatric Exam Review Sets
This content is for members. First, create a free account to browse samples — then choose a plan to unlock everything. Already a member? Log in here.

What this deck covers

Ethics & Communication – Exam Review Set 3 in 50 board-style clinical cases with worked explanations. Each case gives you a clinical vignette, four options, the correct answer, and an explanation of why each of the other three is wrong, with the guideline or textbook it follows named on the answer.

Board-style teaching questions for paediatricians and trainees preparing for paediatric board, MRCPCH and licensing examinations. Written from published guidelines and standard paediatric textbooks, with the source named on every answer.

The 50 cases, in order

  1. Acting for the child’s own good
  2. The duty to tell the truth
  3. The kind of person, not the rule
  4. Where the consequences decide
  5. Right and wrong in itself
  6. Where the need is greatest
  7. Withheld for what they did
  8. Both roles, one rulebook
  9. A favour nobody else could ask
  10. Ask first, then take the answer
  11. One signature, or two
  12. The word for touching unasked
  13. When she may decide for herself
  14. When the law compels it
  15. Their choice, not the doctor’s
  16. One walks out, the other asks him on
  17. In her own words
  18. Right intention, wrong hand
  19. Done exactly as planned
  20. Everyone knows, and does it anyway
  21. Put there years before
  22. Seen early, seen once
  23. The thing every patient gets
  24. Severe, and not on any list
  25. When four things line up
  26. Not about the medicine at all
  27. When the screen will not let you
  28. Why the paper slips appeared
  29. One change, three causes
  30. Spell it out instead
  31. One keystroke, ten times the dose
  32. Carried on purpose
  33. Why one crew does better
  34. Knowing is not the same as saying
  35. Not settled on the ward round
  36. Courtesy is not the same thing
  37. Good product, compromised advice
  38. Nothing asked, nothing free
  39. Two wrongs, and only one is hers
  40. Both at once, on the same day
  41. Where the sponsorship bites
  42. The shorter queue, and its limit
  43. Paying without buying
  44. Agreed, and unprovable
  45. Read at home, and asked again
  46. What is shared, not how it is decided
  47. How much, and how fast
  48. The pause that is not wasted
  49. Interrupted, then it vanished
  50. What the control arm gives up

Diagnoses and management options tested

Across the fifty cases you are asked to choose between options such as: Justice, Deontology, whatever the totals come to, Tell her teaching hospitals do not work that way, A slip in the execution of a correct plan, The operating theatre and recovery area, Assault, since the treatment was not authorised, Re-train everyone on the current system, A point with no zero on either side of it, Explaining the plan to the family, Nothing, as both are perfectly adequate, Permitted if he withdraws one, Nothing whatever, in any circumstances, Retributive justice, A mistake: the regimen was wrong.

Clinical pearls from this deck

  • The two that get swapped are doing good and avoiding harm. If the stem says what she is NOT weighing, it is telling you which principle to discard, not which to choose.
  • Veracity is not a style of speaking. Pacing and gentleness are always available; accuracy is the part that cannot be traded, because consent collapses without it.
  • When a stem praises habits rather than decisions, it is pointing at character. That is the one theory whose answer does not change when the rulebook is silent.
  • Two words carry most of the theory questions. Teleology looks forward to the result; deontology looks at the act itself. Everything else in the stem is decoration.
  • Ask whether the argument would change if the numbers changed. If it would not, you are looking at a duty; if it would, you are looking at a consequence.
  • Every wrong option in a siting question is a real consideration. The question is which one is NEED; the others are cost, convenience and institutional benefit wearing its clothes.

Work through the deck once for recognition, then again a week later to test yourself — each question gives the answer and explains why every other option fails.

More from this system: all ethics and communication case decks · pediatric reference values.

Scroll to Top